Ethos

We seek to remain undivisive, providing critical thinking skills and insights into many fields as well as the knowledge of the current world to enable our readers to make justified conclusions and in turn improve the world.

In practice this means we explain economics, which shapes people’s voting decisions – influencing politics, law, and the economy in turn. Essentially we explain the entire world around us in a way that does not divide but instead provides knowledge.

We do not chase trending outrage or the flavour of the month, condemning figures without justification, instead we explain ideologies and policies – the good and the bad – and allow our readers to reach a justified conclusion. When we do provide our judgement it will be clearly defined and stated outwardly.

We seek balance in our reporting by avoiding terms such as “left”, “right” and labelling ideologies. In place of these we describe policies, philosophies, economics and values of parties and individuals. However, we do critique the “left” and “right” as traditional fields of politics or to refer to broad conceptions but we do not say they are a negative party as they are far right or far left we explain the positives and the negatives.

We seek to inform our readers on the depth of events: the history, sociology, economics and philosophy to allow them to make their own conclusions.